27 February 1997
ON THE NATURE OF THE PRIMORDIAL
To err is to be human
by Bruce DePalma
The description of the Primordial Field is imaginary but that is precisely
why it is correct. The best instrument for the exploration of this question
is the human mind.
The representation of reality within our conscious persona is constructed
out of the myriad chemical reactions to the sensory stimuli of "external
reality". On this basis the sensory image is living and we could speculate
the external reality was non-living unless we knew the self-evident proposition
that all reality was alive.
Nothing could exist unless the organizing force were more powerful than
destructive & dissipative effects. Consequentially we can view the
organizing force as transcendent and that destruction and dissipation are
facets of the constructive energy.
The most profound manifestation of the creative force in material form
are the thoughts and ideas. Thoughts and ideas are modifiers in the direction
and application of Force. We arrive at the idea that the primordial field
is a field of pure Force.
The detection of an isotropic field consists of distorting it and noting
the force isotropys.
On the highest level of abstraction Force is Intelligence; consequently
the primordial field is intelligent. Within the limits imposed by the capability
of my human mind reality exists as it is. Its architecture is beyond the
scope of my discovery.
Nevertheless that architecture forms a basis for the positing and asking
of questions. A dialogue of questions and answers, the field of a design
for Physics. As long as we remain rational, 'it' remains rational.
The primordial field has all known properties. We understand its force
nature through experiments with charged capacitors, magnets, and gravity.
In every case, a distortion of the primordial field results in an unbalanced
Apparently the primordial field has certain mechanical characterizations
which allow for the propagation of 'waves'. Mechanical characteristics
mandate the possibilities of discrete 'particles'. Both characteristics
exist simultaneously. The measuring instrument asks the question, the Universe
provides the answer.
Consequently, in the Universe of the primordial field the Nature or origin
of the field is unknown being beyond the conception of the minds which
are examining it.
The human mind or body is a materialization of an implied tendency in the
body of space. Consequently man can never know his source because only
in the downstream of time is the material manifestation formed.
Can the material manifestation form more subtle connections than itself?
Can you have more subtle thoughts than you can think? The plenum of existence
is formed within the limitations of the human mind.
The existence of the primordial field can be proved by the manifestation
of unbalanced forces through distortion of its normally isotropic condition,
i.e. by electricity, magnetism or gravity.
That the primordial field has certain mechanical characteristics can be
shown by the apparent propagation of waves and the existence of discrete
Mathematics is a facet of the Nature of the intelligent primordial field.
The mathematics we presently use is derived from the counting of integers.
This is OK when counting marbles or money. What is the Nature of the integer?
Is an integer exactly the result of a number or are properties of counting
being ignored like the higher order precessional modes of rotation, i.e.
nutation, ..., ..., etc.
Every experiment which is done qualifies and quantifies the primordial
field in some aspect.
If you want chaos you get chaos. For those of us who govern our thoughts
with logic we get logic. Actually logic and chaos are the extrema of what
we know as thought.
For those of us who consider ourselves sophisticated we amuse ourselves
with a pastime called Science. This the application of logic (the self-defining
reasoning process in Nature), to Nature. This self-examination in itself
has the limitation of the manifest in attempting to describe the un-manifest.
A final thought. The primordial field is responsible for the inertia of
material objects. Without rotation the manifested inertial mass is isotropic,
as is the primordial field. With rotation anisotropy is established firstly
in the existence of directions for the inertia experiment, i.e. axial motion
or motion in the plane of rotation. Apparently there is a connection, (through
time), between the manifest material object and the primordial field. Consequently,
rotation of a material object introduces spatial anisotropy of inertial
mass measurements into the spatial region surrounding the rotating object.
It is suggestive that magnetism, a phenomena of spatial anisotropy, could
be introduced into a normally non-magnetic material, i.e. brass, through
the influence of a field of spatial inertia anisotropy. Certain recent
experiments of Monstein have borne this out.
Although as a field it is no more primary than electricity, magnetism,
or gravity, the spatial inertial anisotropy created by a rotating object
is called the OD field.
Back to Homepage